Triple

T23036191
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pareto improvement E573600 entity
Predicate characterizedBy P662 FINISHED
Object Pareto dominance NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pareto dominance | Statement: [Pareto improvement, characterizedBy, Pareto dominance]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pareto dominance
Context triple: [Pareto improvement, characterizedBy, Pareto dominance]
  • A. Pareto efficiency
    Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
  • B. Electre
    Electre is a modern French theatrical adaptation of the Electra myth written by playwright Jean Giraudoux.
  • C. Pareto
    Pareto is an Italian surname most famously associated with economist and sociologist Vilfredo Pareto, whose work led to the Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule).
  • D. PairWise Rankings
    PairWise Rankings is a statistical system used to compare and rank NCAA Division I men's ice hockey teams, closely mirroring the criteria used for at-large selection to the national tournament.
  • E. Pareto improvement chosen
    A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b911188190bc3d96326c847969 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1850fe5348190b42259595d82cff4 completed April 29, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:53 p.m.