Triple
T23021591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kaw Lake |
E573178
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWildlifeArea |
P28402
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kaw Wildlife Management Area |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kaw Wildlife Management Area | Statement: [Kaw Lake, hasWildlifeArea, Kaw Wildlife Management Area]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaw Wildlife Management Area Context triple: [Kaw Lake, hasWildlifeArea, Kaw Wildlife Management Area]
-
A.
Kerr Wildlife Management Area
Kerr Wildlife Management Area is a state-managed wildlife conservation and public hunting area in Kerr County, Texas, known for habitat management, research, and outdoor recreation.
-
B.
Tonda Wildlife Management Area
Tonda Wildlife Management Area is Papua New Guinea’s largest protected wetland reserve, renowned for its rich biodiversity and importance as a habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife.
-
C.
Catherine Creek Wildlife Management Area
Catherine Creek Wildlife Management Area is a protected natural area managed for wildlife conservation, habitat protection, and public outdoor recreation such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife viewing.
-
D.
Rufus J. Brown Wildlife Management Area
Rufus J. Brown Wildlife Management Area is a designated conservation and public hunting area in Arkansas County, Arkansas, managed to protect wildlife habitat and support outdoor recreation.
-
E.
Okatibbee Wildlife Management Area
Okatibbee Wildlife Management Area is a designated conservation and public recreation area in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, known for its hunting, fishing, and wildlife habitat.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaw Wildlife Management Area Target entity description: Kaw Wildlife Management Area is a protected public hunting and wildlife conservation area associated with Kaw Lake in north-central Oklahoma.
-
A.
Kerr Wildlife Management Area
Kerr Wildlife Management Area is a state-managed wildlife conservation and public hunting area in Kerr County, Texas, known for habitat management, research, and outdoor recreation.
-
B.
Tonda Wildlife Management Area
Tonda Wildlife Management Area is Papua New Guinea’s largest protected wetland reserve, renowned for its rich biodiversity and importance as a habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife.
-
C.
Catherine Creek Wildlife Management Area
Catherine Creek Wildlife Management Area is a protected natural area managed for wildlife conservation, habitat protection, and public outdoor recreation such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife viewing.
-
D.
Rufus J. Brown Wildlife Management Area
Rufus J. Brown Wildlife Management Area is a designated conservation and public hunting area in Arkansas County, Arkansas, managed to protect wildlife habitat and support outdoor recreation.
-
E.
Okatibbee Wildlife Management Area
Okatibbee Wildlife Management Area is a designated conservation and public recreation area in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, known for its hunting, fishing, and wildlife habitat.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b821008190b0e09cb02092aae1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f183e9208081908fdbb8e21cacedde |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:52 p.m.