Triple
T2300764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fairfield County, Ohio |
E51724
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lancaster, Ohio |
E372207
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lancaster, Ohio | Statement: [Fairfield County, Ohio, largestCity, Lancaster, Ohio]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lancaster, Ohio Context triple: [Fairfield County, Ohio, largestCity, Lancaster, Ohio]
-
A.
Lancaster, Ohio
chosen
Lancaster, Ohio is a small city in central Ohio known for its historic downtown, glassmaking heritage, and proximity to the Hocking Hills region.
-
B.
New London, Ohio
New London, Ohio is a small village in Huron County known for its rural character and location in north-central Ohio.
-
C.
Wakeman, Ohio
Wakeman, Ohio is a small village in northern Ohio known for its rural character and location within Huron County.
-
D.
Riverside, Ohio
Riverside, Ohio is a suburban city in Montgomery County that forms part of the Dayton metropolitan area in southwestern Ohio.
-
E.
Montgomery, Ohio
Montgomery, Ohio is a suburban city in Hamilton County near Cincinnati, known for its historic charm, affluent residential character, and well-regarded schools.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b0a9f248190bcff941463d8f65a |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc5edc1348190a4d84606b1310711 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:30 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b432e588308190bd331d7b8776e546 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 3:53 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:49 p.m.