Triple

T22965006
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bombieri–Pila determinant method E571014 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Pila–Zannier method NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pila–Zannier method | Statement: [Bombieri–Pila determinant method, relatedTo, Pila–Zannier method]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pila–Zannier method
Context triple: [Bombieri–Pila determinant method, relatedTo, Pila–Zannier method]
  • A. Bombieri–Pila determinant method
    The Bombieri–Pila determinant method is a technique in analytic and Diophantine geometry used to obtain upper bounds on the number of rational or integral points of bounded height lying on algebraic curves or more general sets.
  • B. Siegel's theorem on integral points
    Siegel's theorem on integral points is a fundamental result in number theory and Diophantine geometry stating that certain algebraic curves, notably those of genus at least one, have only finitely many integral points.
  • C. Siegel’s lemma
    Siegel’s lemma is a result in number theory that guarantees the existence of small-height integer solutions to systems of linear equations with integer coefficients.
  • D. Faltings' theorem
    Faltings' theorem is a landmark result in arithmetic geometry that proves every algebraic curve of genus greater than one over a number field has only finitely many rational points.
  • E. Faltings height
    The Faltings height is an arithmetic invariant that measures the complexity of an abelian variety (or algebraic curve) over number fields, playing a central role in Diophantine geometry and arithmetic geometry.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pila–Zannier method
Target entity description: The Pila–Zannier method is a powerful technique in Diophantine geometry that combines o-minimality and counting rational points on definable sets to prove results such as the Manin–Mumford and André–Oort conjectures.
  • A. Bombieri–Pila determinant method
    The Bombieri–Pila determinant method is a technique in analytic and Diophantine geometry used to obtain upper bounds on the number of rational or integral points of bounded height lying on algebraic curves or more general sets.
  • B. Siegel's theorem on integral points
    Siegel's theorem on integral points is a fundamental result in number theory and Diophantine geometry stating that certain algebraic curves, notably those of genus at least one, have only finitely many integral points.
  • C. Siegel’s lemma
    Siegel’s lemma is a result in number theory that guarantees the existence of small-height integer solutions to systems of linear equations with integer coefficients.
  • D. Faltings' theorem
    Faltings' theorem is a landmark result in arithmetic geometry that proves every algebraic curve of genus greater than one over a number field has only finitely many rational points.
  • E. Faltings height
    The Faltings height is an arithmetic invariant that measures the complexity of an abelian variety (or algebraic curve) over number fields, playing a central role in Diophantine geometry and arithmetic geometry.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b212a88190b5259caf51606084 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f181f763688190aab8f444a1a71577 completed April 29, 2026, 3:58 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:47 p.m.