Triple
T22965006
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bombieri–Pila determinant method |
E571014
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pila–Zannier method |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pila–Zannier method | Statement: [Bombieri–Pila determinant method, relatedTo, Pila–Zannier method]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pila–Zannier method Context triple: [Bombieri–Pila determinant method, relatedTo, Pila–Zannier method]
-
A.
Bombieri–Pila determinant method
The Bombieri–Pila determinant method is a technique in analytic and Diophantine geometry used to obtain upper bounds on the number of rational or integral points of bounded height lying on algebraic curves or more general sets.
-
B.
Siegel's theorem on integral points
Siegel's theorem on integral points is a fundamental result in number theory and Diophantine geometry stating that certain algebraic curves, notably those of genus at least one, have only finitely many integral points.
-
C.
Siegel’s lemma
Siegel’s lemma is a result in number theory that guarantees the existence of small-height integer solutions to systems of linear equations with integer coefficients.
-
D.
Faltings' theorem
Faltings' theorem is a landmark result in arithmetic geometry that proves every algebraic curve of genus greater than one over a number field has only finitely many rational points.
-
E.
Faltings height
The Faltings height is an arithmetic invariant that measures the complexity of an abelian variety (or algebraic curve) over number fields, playing a central role in Diophantine geometry and arithmetic geometry.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pila–Zannier method Target entity description: The Pila–Zannier method is a powerful technique in Diophantine geometry that combines o-minimality and counting rational points on definable sets to prove results such as the Manin–Mumford and André–Oort conjectures.
-
A.
Bombieri–Pila determinant method
The Bombieri–Pila determinant method is a technique in analytic and Diophantine geometry used to obtain upper bounds on the number of rational or integral points of bounded height lying on algebraic curves or more general sets.
-
B.
Siegel's theorem on integral points
Siegel's theorem on integral points is a fundamental result in number theory and Diophantine geometry stating that certain algebraic curves, notably those of genus at least one, have only finitely many integral points.
-
C.
Siegel’s lemma
Siegel’s lemma is a result in number theory that guarantees the existence of small-height integer solutions to systems of linear equations with integer coefficients.
-
D.
Faltings' theorem
Faltings' theorem is a landmark result in arithmetic geometry that proves every algebraic curve of genus greater than one over a number field has only finitely many rational points.
-
E.
Faltings height
The Faltings height is an arithmetic invariant that measures the complexity of an abelian variety (or algebraic curve) over number fields, playing a central role in Diophantine geometry and arithmetic geometry.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b212a88190b5259caf51606084 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f181f763688190aab8f444a1a71577 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:47 p.m.