Triple

T22954871
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Phillips County, Montana E570726 entity
Predicate containsCity P294 FINISHED
Object Malta, Montana NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Malta, Montana | Statement: [Phillips County, Montana, containsCity, Malta, Montana]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Malta, Montana
Context triple: [Phillips County, Montana, containsCity, Malta, Montana]
  • A. Malta, Montana chosen
    Malta, Montana is a small rural city in north-central Montana that serves as a regional hub for agriculture, ranching, and access to nearby outdoor recreation areas.
  • B. Monarch, Montana
    Monarch, Montana is a small unincorporated community in Cascade County located in the Little Belt Mountains of central Montana.
  • C. Grant, Montana
    Grant, Montana is a small unincorporated rural community located in southwestern Montana within Beaverhead County.
  • D. Polaris, Montana
    Polaris, Montana is a small unincorporated community in southwestern Montana’s Beaverhead County, known as a gateway to nearby outdoor recreation and natural attractions.
  • E. Jordan, Montana
    Jordan, Montana is a small rural town in Garfield County that serves as a gateway to the wide-open ranchlands and badlands of eastern Montana.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b212a88190b5259caf51606084 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f181f09de48190b55913570c965412 completed April 29, 2026, 3:58 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:46 p.m.