Triple
T22934295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Celebic |
E569535
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Toraja-Sa’dan language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toraja-Sa’dan language | Statement: [Celebic, hasLanguage, Toraja-Sa’dan language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Toraja-Sa’dan language Context triple: [Celebic, hasLanguage, Toraja-Sa’dan language]
-
A.
Toraja-Saʼdan language
chosen
The Toraja-Saʼdan language is an Austronesian language spoken primarily by the Toraja people in the highland regions of South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
B.
Toraja languages
The Toraja languages are a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken primarily by the Toraja people in the highland regions of South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
C.
Talaud language
The Talaud language is an Austronesian language spoken by the indigenous population of the Talaud Islands in North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
D.
Enrekang language
The Enrekang language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Enrekang people in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
E.
Sidama language
The Sidama language is a Cushitic language spoken primarily by the Sidama people in southern Ethiopia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24590862c8190858f180ad302adab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18134484c8190b7311606c17d058d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.