Triple
T22931523
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rogoźnica |
E569451
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Strzegom |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Strzegom | Statement: [Rogoźnica, partOf, Gmina Strzegom]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Strzegom Context triple: [Rogoźnica, partOf, Gmina Strzegom]
-
A.
Gmina Strzegom
chosen
Gmina Strzegom is an urban-rural administrative district in Lower Silesian Voivodeship in southwestern Poland, centered on the town of Strzegom.
-
B.
Gmina Strzelno
Gmina Strzelno is an administrative district (gmina) in north-central Poland, centered on the town of Strzelno in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Strawczyn
Gmina Strawczyn is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Zgierz
Gmina Zgierz is an administrative district in central Poland that encompasses the rural areas surrounding the town of Zgierz in the Łódź Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Zawichost
Gmina Zawichost is a rural administrative district in south-eastern Poland, centered on the historic town of Zawichost in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458f7d008190901dccbaebeaba24 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1813260608190bb9e1ca704c7e12f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.