Triple
T22930299
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roman Catholic Diocese of Szeged–Csanád |
E569416
|
entity |
| Predicate | cathedralCity |
P9022
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Szeged |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Szeged | Statement: [Roman Catholic Diocese of Szeged–Csanád, cathedralCity, Szeged]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Szeged Context triple: [Roman Catholic Diocese of Szeged–Csanád, cathedralCity, Szeged]
-
A.
Szeged
chosen
Szeged is a prominent city in southern Hungary known for its university, paprika production, and distinctive Art Nouveau architecture.
-
B.
Szekesfehervar
Szekesfehérvár is a historic city in central Hungary that served as a medieval royal seat and coronation site for Hungarian kings.
-
C.
Zalaegerszeg
Zalaegerszeg is a city in western Hungary that serves as the administrative center of Zala County and a regional economic and cultural hub.
-
D.
Debrecen
Debrecen is Hungary’s second-largest city and a key cultural, economic, and educational center in the country’s eastern region.
-
E.
Kaposvár
Kaposvár is a city in southwestern Hungary that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Somogy County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458f7d008190901dccbaebeaba24 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18131956c8190b8c850fc1d57a119 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:44 p.m.