Triple
T22904030
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Narendra Karmarkar |
E568397
|
entity |
| Predicate | algorithmComplexity |
P27167
|
FINISHED |
| Object | polynomial time |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: polynomial time | Statement: [Narendra Karmarkar, algorithmComplexity, polynomial time]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: algorithmComplexity Context triple: [Narendra Karmarkar, algorithmComplexity, polynomial time]
-
A.
timeComplexity
chosen
Indicates the computational growth rate of an algorithm’s resource usage (typically time) as a function of input size.
-
B.
spaceComplexity
Indicates the relationship between an algorithm and the amount of memory it requires as a function of input size.
-
C.
hasComplexity
Indicates that something possesses a certain level or type of complexity, often in terms of structure, behavior, or difficulty.
-
D.
computationalCost
Indicates the amount of computing resources (such as time, memory, or processing power) required to perform a given operation or process.
-
E.
hasReasoningComplexity
Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458cd9e48190943ad2e34485d939 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1801895f48190bb8d49a41feac7ef |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b6b2e2481908258156937b5a745 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:41 p.m.