Triple
T22901756
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canavese dialect |
E568335
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Piemontese |
C18421
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Piemontese Context triple: [Canavese dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of Piemontese]
-
A.
regional variety of the Piedmontese language
chosen
A regional variety of the Piedmontese language is a geographically localized form of Piedmontese characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes syntactic features shared by speakers in a specific area.
-
B.
variety of Piedmontese
A variety of Piedmontese is a distinct form or dialect of the Piedmontese language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or syntactic features associated with a particular geographic area or speech community.
-
C.
Ligurian dialect
Ligurian dialect is a Romance language variety spoken primarily in the Liguria region of northwestern Italy and nearby areas, characterized by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from standard Italian.
-
D.
Emilian-Romagnol dialect
Emilian-Romagnol dialect is a group of closely related Gallo-Italic varieties spoken in the Emilia-Romagna region of northern Italy, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features that differentiate it from standard Italian and neighboring dialects.
-
E.
regional variety of Lombard
A regional variety of Lombard is a specific form of the Lombard language spoken in a particular geographic area, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and syntactic features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458cd9e48190943ad2e34485d939 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:41 p.m.