Triple
T22891155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Employment Claims Tribunals |
E568041
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealRights |
P1031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limited rights of appeal on questions of law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited rights of appeal on questions of law | Statement: [Employment Claims Tribunals, appealRights, limited rights of appeal on questions of law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealRights Context triple: [Employment Claims Tribunals, appealRights, limited rights of appeal on questions of law]
-
A.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
B.
appealBeyond
Indicates that something has significance, relevance, or attractiveness that extends beyond a specified scope, group, or context.
-
C.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
-
D.
claimedRight
Indicates that an entity asserts or demands a right or entitlement in relation to another entity or resource.
-
E.
appealsFrom
chosen
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458c23ec81908fa2570692c6614f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17fc59e108190a22f90c2439830fb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef3b6b2e2481908258156937b5a745 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:40 p.m.