Triple
T22849511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jingpho |
E566319
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialect |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thingnai dialect |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thingnai dialect | Statement: [Jingpho, hasDialect, Thingnai dialect]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thingnai dialect Context triple: [Jingpho, hasDialect, Thingnai dialect]
-
A.
Thingnai dialect
chosen
The Thingnai dialect is a regional variety of the Jingpo language spoken by Jingpo/Kachin communities in parts of Myanmar and neighboring areas.
-
B.
Noatia dialect
The Noatia dialect is a regional variety of the Kokborok language spoken primarily by the Noatia community in Tripura, India.
-
C.
Tappalang dialect
The Tappalang dialect is a regional variety of the Mandar language spoken by Mandar communities in parts of West Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
D.
Tlaisun dialect
The Tlaisun dialect is a regional variety of the Falam Chin language spoken by the Tlaisun community in parts of Chin State, Myanmar.
-
E.
Topnaar dialect
The Topnaar dialect is a regional variety of the Nama language traditionally spoken by the Topnaar people of Namibia, particularly along the Kuiseb River in the Namib Desert.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458750b481908a8e4cf4609cc6cf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17eb74700819090d191b3a7a17034 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:36 p.m.