Triple
T22835339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Suðurland |
E565929
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Skógafoss |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Skógafoss | Statement: [Suðurland, contains, Skógafoss]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Skógafoss Context triple: [Suðurland, contains, Skógafoss]
-
A.
Skógafoss waterfall
chosen
Skógafoss waterfall is one of Iceland’s largest and most famous waterfalls, known for its powerful 60-meter drop, frequent rainbows, and dramatic cliffside setting.
-
B.
Follafoss
Follafoss is a small village in Trøndelag county, Norway, known for its hydroelectric power plant and scenic fjord-side setting.
-
C.
Gullfoss waterfall
Gullfoss waterfall is one of Iceland’s most famous and powerful multi-tiered waterfalls, located on the Hvítá river and a highlight of the Golden Circle route.
-
D.
Hafragilsfoss waterfall
Hafragilsfoss waterfall is a powerful cascade on Iceland’s Jökulsá á Fjöllum river, known for its dramatic drop into the rugged Hafragil canyon within the country’s volcanic northeast.
-
E.
Vammafossen
Vammafossen is a notable waterfall on the Glomma River in Norway, known for its powerful flow and associated hydroelectric power development.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245869e188190a196584f36e682da |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17e2e3e7481909d12dc5008136880 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:35 p.m.