Triple

T22823192
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fort Williams E565280 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Harbor Defenses of Portland NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harbor Defenses of Portland | Statement: [Fort Williams, partOf, Harbor Defenses of Portland]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harbor Defenses of Portland
Context triple: [Fort Williams, partOf, Harbor Defenses of Portland]
  • A. Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth
    Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations that protected the strategic harbor area around Portsmouth, New Hampshire, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries.
  • B. Harbor Defenses of the Columbia
    Harbor Defenses of the Columbia was a U.S. Army coastal defense command responsible for protecting the mouth of the Columbia River and nearby coastal areas through a network of forts and artillery installations.
  • C. Portland Breakwater Fort
    Portland Breakwater Fort is a 19th-century coastal artillery fort in Dorset, England, built on the breakwater of Portland Harbour to protect the naval anchorage.
  • D. Boston Harbor defenses
    Boston Harbor defenses were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations designed to protect Boston Harbor and the city of Boston from naval attack.
  • E. Fort Arnold
    Fort Arnold was a key Revolutionary War fortification overlooking the Hudson River at West Point, later renamed Fort Clinton after Benedict Arnold’s attempted betrayal.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harbor Defenses of Portland
Target entity description: Harbor Defenses of Portland were a network of U.S. coastal fortifications and artillery installations that protected the approaches to Portland, Maine, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
  • A. Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth
    Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations that protected the strategic harbor area around Portsmouth, New Hampshire, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries.
  • B. Harbor Defenses of the Columbia
    Harbor Defenses of the Columbia was a U.S. Army coastal defense command responsible for protecting the mouth of the Columbia River and nearby coastal areas through a network of forts and artillery installations.
  • C. Portland Breakwater Fort
    Portland Breakwater Fort is a 19th-century coastal artillery fort in Dorset, England, built on the breakwater of Portland Harbour to protect the naval anchorage.
  • D. Boston Harbor defenses
    Boston Harbor defenses were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations designed to protect Boston Harbor and the city of Boston from naval attack.
  • E. Fort Arnold
    Fort Arnold was a key Revolutionary War fortification overlooking the Hudson River at West Point, later renamed Fort Clinton after Benedict Arnold’s attempted betrayal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17dd2005081909baef070124eb839 completed April 29, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:34 p.m.