Triple

T22819129
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ITU-T G.9807.1 E565180 entity
Predicate definesSymmetricRates P149858 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [ITU-T G.9807.1, definesSymmetricRates, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesSymmetricRates
Context triple: [ITU-T G.9807.1, definesSymmetricRates, true]
  • A. symbolRates
    Indicates a quantitative rate or value associated with a given symbol in relation to another reference (such as time, currency, or unit).
  • B. symmetricIn
    Indicates that the relationship or property holds identically when the roles of the related entities are interchanged, i.e., it is invariant under swapping its arguments.
  • C. usesRatesSetBy
    Indicates that one entity applies or follows the pricing or rate structure determined by another entity.
  • D. hasExchangeSymmetry
    Indicates that a relationship or configuration remains unchanged when the positions or roles of the involved entities are interchanged.
  • E. supportsCodeRates
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, processing, or operating at the specific code rates associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17dce762c8190934fb921f942c9fd completed April 29, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2d117088190acbfe130d84f8627 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb577e2081909f4a4e9c296535c0 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:33 p.m.