Triple

T22791009
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ellsberg paradox E564108 entity
Predicate canonicalSetup P149726 FINISHED
Object two-urn problem LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-urn problem | Statement: [Ellsberg paradox, canonicalSetup, two-urn problem]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canonicalSetup
Context triple: [Ellsberg paradox, canonicalSetup, two-urn problem]
  • A. typicalSetup
    Indicates that an entity is arranged, configured, or organized in its standard or commonly used setup relative to another entity or context.
  • B. frameworkEstablished
    Indicates that a structured system of rules, guidelines, or components has been formally created and put in place to support or govern subsequent activities or relationships.
  • C. canonicalPlacement
    Indicates the standard or preferred position or arrangement of one entity relative to another within a defined structure or system.
  • D. typicalInstallMethod
    Indicates the usual or most common method by which something is installed or set up.
  • E. controlledInstallation
    Indicates that an entity has authoritative oversight or management responsibility over the setup, configuration, or deployment of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2455500788190b4b33030461f3bbd completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17c3545fc819084af67cc25e94839 completed April 29, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2c32e8c8190b73bb9965ed47d64 completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb5681f88190821129ced752f190 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:29 p.m.