Triple

T2276146
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Falasha E50774 entity
Predicate sensitivityStatus P8487 FINISHED
Object offensive to many community members LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: offensive to many community members | Statement: [Falasha, sensitivityStatus, offensive to many community members]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sensitivityStatus
Context triple: [Falasha, sensitivityStatus, offensive to many community members]
  • A. sensitivityFeature
    Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a sensitivity-related characteristic, parameter, or attribute of another entity.
  • B. sensitivityRegion
    Indicates the specific area or domain within which a subject is particularly responsive, vulnerable, or reactive to a given influence or condition.
  • C. securityStatus
    Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
  • D. statusIndicates chosen
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • E. hasSensor
    Indicates that one entity is equipped with, contains, or uses a particular sensor.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b05910c8190a9a2b1ff230c85f9 completed March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc39c6ff0819081a07696f1c29990 completed March 7, 2026, 6:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbdb7719081909143efa8f48df4e4 completed March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.