Triple
T2276103
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Court of Appeal of Versailles |
E50773
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfAppealCourt |
P8214
|
FINISHED |
| Object | general jurisdiction court of appeal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: general jurisdiction court of appeal | Statement: [Court of Appeal of Versailles, typeOfAppealCourt, general jurisdiction court of appeal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfAppealCourt Context triple: [Court of Appeal of Versailles, typeOfAppealCourt, general jurisdiction court of appeal]
-
A.
typeOfAppeals
Indicates the specific category or kind of appeals associated with or applied to a given case, decision, or legal action.
-
B.
hasTypeOfCourt
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of court.
-
C.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
E.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b05910c8190a9a2b1ff230c85f9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc39c6ff0819081a07696f1c29990 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb7719081909143efa8f48df4e4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.