Triple

T22730967
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Law 110-325 E562131 entity
Predicate rejects P438 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. | Statement: [Public Law 110-325, rejects, Supreme Court decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Supreme Court decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.
Context triple: [Public Law 110-325, rejects, Supreme Court decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.]
  • A. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. chosen
    Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted who qualifies as disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden the law’s coverage through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
  • B. Supreme Court decision in Westfall v. Erwin
    The Supreme Court decision in Westfall v. Erwin was a 1988 ruling that limited federal employees’ immunity from state-law tort suits, prompting Congress to enact the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act to restore broader protections.
  • C. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
    Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the standard for awarding attorney’s fees to prevailing defendants in Title VII civil rights cases, holding they may recover fees only when the plaintiff’s claim is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation.
  • D. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
  • E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24550859c81908727d91efc3a81b4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1792cb9cc8190a7c45032427bca1a completed April 29, 2026, 3:21 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:21 p.m.