Triple
T2272746
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ruiz |
E50696
|
entity |
| Predicate | commonInProfession |
P12166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | association football players |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: association football players | Statement: [Ruiz, commonInProfession, association football players]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonInProfession Context triple: [Ruiz, commonInProfession, association football players]
-
A.
relatedProfession
Indicates that two entities have professions that are connected or associated in some meaningful way, such as being in the same field, industry, or professional domain.
-
B.
sharesProfessionWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities have the same profession or occupational role.
-
C.
recognizesProfession
Indicates that one entity acknowledges or identifies another entity’s professional role or occupation as such.
-
D.
traditionalOccupations
Indicates that an entity is associated with occupations or jobs that are customary, long-established, or culturally traditional within a particular community or context.
-
E.
subjectOccupation
Indicates that the subject holds or performs a particular job, profession, or role as their occupation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b05910c8190a9a2b1ff230c85f9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc39c6ff0819081a07696f1c29990 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb7719081909143efa8f48df4e4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.