Triple
T22710329
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ABCL |
E561573
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAccessFromLisp |
P1017
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Java fields |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Java fields | Statement: [ABCL, canAccessFromLisp, Java fields]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAccessFromLisp Context triple: [ABCL, canAccessFromLisp, Java fields]
-
A.
canAccedeTo
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or right to gain access to or enter into another entity, resource, or state.
-
B.
alsoAccessibleFrom
Indicates that a location, resource, or entity can be reached or obtained not only from one specified source or path but from an additional source or path as well.
-
C.
hasAccessTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is permitted to enter, use, or interact with another entity, resource, or location.
-
D.
hasAccessFunction
Indicates that one entity is associated with a function or mechanism that enables access to another entity or resource.
-
E.
hasAccessTowards
Indicates that one entity possesses the ability, permission, or means to reach, use, or interact with another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454f1348819088d83f420925a5c1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17907d7288190bb53f76974f95cef |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62bd657c81909f7b01245b080a5f |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:17 p.m.