Triple
T22697314
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Situated near Lăpuș River valley |
E561216
|
entity |
| Predicate | hydrologicalFeature |
P1778
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lăpuș River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lăpuș River | Statement: [Situated near Lăpuș River valley, hydrologicalFeature, Lăpuș River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lăpuș River Context triple: [Situated near Lăpuș River valley, hydrologicalFeature, Lăpuș River]
-
A.
Lăpuș River
chosen
The Lăpuș River is a watercourse in northwestern Romania that flows through Maramureș County and passes by the town of Seini before joining the Someș River.
-
B.
Luncavăț River
The Luncavăț River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that flows through Vâlcea County before joining the Olteț River.
-
C.
Racova River
Racova River is a minor river in eastern Romania that serves as a tributary within the Bârlad River basin.
-
D.
Vițău River
The Vițău River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that serves as a tributary within the Putna River basin.
-
E.
Rudăreasa River
The Rudăreasa River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that flows through the Southern Carpathians before joining the Lotru River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454e615481909c177440be559d2c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1789f26848190bcc5a99e3ed909e7 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:14 p.m.