Triple
T2268932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upland, Pennsylvania |
E50611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLocalIdentifier |
P1285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FIPS code (borough-level) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FIPS code (borough-level) | Statement: [Upland, Pennsylvania, hasLocalIdentifier, FIPS code (borough-level)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalIdentifier Context triple: [Upland, Pennsylvania, hasLocalIdentifier, FIPS code (borough-level)]
-
A.
hasIdentifierSystem
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular system or scheme used to assign and manage its identifiers.
-
B.
hasLocalName
Indicates that an entity is known by a specific name or designation within a particular local language, script, or regional context.
-
C.
hasNoWidelyUsedLocalName
Indicates that the entity does not have a commonly used or widely recognized name in the local language or region.
-
D.
hasLocalNameFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the local or context-specific name or label used to refer to another entity.
-
E.
identifierFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a unique identifying label or code for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b05910c8190a9a2b1ff230c85f9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc39c6ff0819081a07696f1c29990 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb7719081909143efa8f48df4e4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.