Triple
T2265718
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | College Street (New Haven) |
E50139
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNearbyUse |
P19783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | educational buildings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: educational buildings | Statement: [College Street (New Haven), hasNearbyUse, educational buildings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNearbyUse Context triple: [College Street (New Haven), hasNearbyUse, educational buildings]
-
A.
hasNearbyMode
Indicates that one entity has another entity located close enough to be considered in its immediate vicinity or surrounding area.
-
B.
hasNearbyFunction
Indicates that one entity has another entity located close by that serves a related or supportive function.
-
C.
hasNearbyFacility
Indicates that one entity is located close to or in the vicinity of a particular facility.
-
D.
hasNearbyLandUse
chosen
Indicates that one land area is located close to another area characterized by a specific type of land use.
-
E.
hasNearbyCommon
Indicates that two entities share at least one common element, feature, or connection that is located within a specified nearby distance or vicinity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b01e0048190ba96431b5f990ba9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc2ea65288190bc8644a07a11dfa9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb592588190ac1ef5e8c54575b1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.