Triple

T2261698
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pessac-Léognan E50052 entity
Predicate whiteWineStyle P2082 FINISHED
Object oak-aged dry white LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oak-aged dry white | Statement: [Pessac-Léognan, whiteWineStyle, oak-aged dry white]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: whiteWineStyle
Context triple: [Pessac-Léognan, whiteWineStyle, oak-aged dry white]
  • A. wineStyle chosen
    Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
  • B. whiteWineProductionAllowed
    Indicates that producing white wine is permitted under the relevant rules, regulations, or conditions.
  • C. wineColor
    Indicates the color attribute or hue associated with a given wine.
  • D. primaryGrapeVariety
    Indicates that one entity is the main or predominant grape variety used in producing the other entity (typically a wine or wine-based product).
  • E. traditionalGrapeVariety
    Indicates that a grape variety is traditionally or historically used in a specific region, wine style, or cultural winemaking practice.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b01e0048190ba96431b5f990ba9 completed March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc2ea65288190bc8644a07a11dfa9 completed March 7, 2026, 6:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbdb592588190ac1ef5e8c54575b1 completed March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.