Triple
T2257151
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lower Yosemite Fall Trail |
E49752
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectToHazard |
P1950
|
FINISHED |
| Object | slippery rocks near waterfall mist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: slippery rocks near waterfall mist | Statement: [Lower Yosemite Fall Trail, subjectToHazard, slippery rocks near waterfall mist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToHazard Context triple: [Lower Yosemite Fall Trail, subjectToHazard, slippery rocks near waterfall mist]
-
A.
hasNotableHazard
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant risk, danger, or harmful condition that is noteworthy or exceptional.
-
B.
hazardType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of hazard associated with an entity or situation.
-
C.
hazardScope
Indicates the range or extent within which a particular hazard is relevant, applicable, or has effect.
-
D.
hasClimbingHazard
Indicates that something presents a risk or danger specifically associated with climbing activities.
-
E.
susceptibleTo
Indicates that one entity is vulnerable or likely to be affected, harmed, or influenced by another entity or factor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aaa9250819095e127d0d77e8a32 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc1570dc88190bb2b17ed4c25dbb5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb34c148190b51e99f540f97204 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:47 p.m.