Triple

T2257141
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lower Yosemite Fall Trail E49752 entity
Predicate hasInterpretiveSigns P36768 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Lower Yosemite Fall Trail, hasInterpretiveSigns, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterpretiveSigns
Context triple: [Lower Yosemite Fall Trail, hasInterpretiveSigns, yes]
  • A. hasInterpretiveExhibits
    Indicates that an entity includes or provides exhibits designed to explain, interpret, or contextualize information for viewers.
  • B. signInterpretation
    Indicates that one entity provides or assigns a particular meaning, explanation, or reading to a given sign, symbol, or signal.
  • C. containsInterpretationOf
    Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
  • D. languageOfSignage
    Indicates the language used on signs or written displays associated with an entity.
  • E. interpretiveStatus
    Indicates the evaluative or explanatory stance assigned to something, such as how it is understood, classified, or interpreted within a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aaa9250819095e127d0d77e8a32 completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc1570dc88190bb2b17ed4c25dbb5 completed March 7, 2026, 6:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbdb34c148190b51e99f540f97204 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbe86dbcc81908c72793af8fe2a4d completed March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:47 p.m.