Triple
T225516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Norfolk County |
E4305
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUrbanCharacter |
P4441
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Norfolk County, hasUrbanCharacter, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUrbanCharacter Context triple: [Norfolk County, hasUrbanCharacter, yes]
-
A.
hasUrbanFeature
Indicates that a place or area possesses a specific urban element or infrastructure feature (such as roads, parks, or buildings) as part of its built environment.
-
B.
isUrbanCounty
chosen
Indicates that a county is classified as urban, typically based on population density, development level, or similar urbanization criteria.
-
C.
hasMetropolitan
Indicates that an entity is associated with, served by, or located within a specific metropolitan area.
-
D.
hasTown
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a town as part of its structure, jurisdiction, or composition.
-
E.
urbanAreaType
Indicates the classification of an area based on its urban characteristics or development type (e.g., city, town, suburb, metropolitan region).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257363ffc81909757bde7ab3404da |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25dec53ac8190912f3d79576131fa |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b5739dc8190bad8bfa330ce0499 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.