Triple
T22512845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Family Π |
E556563
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMethodOfIdentification |
P7024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | analysis of shared errors and unique readings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: analysis of shared errors and unique readings | Statement: [Family Π, hasMethodOfIdentification, analysis of shared errors and unique readings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMethodOfIdentification Context triple: [Family Π, hasMethodOfIdentification, analysis of shared errors and unique readings]
-
A.
hasIdentityDocument
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific identity document.
-
B.
hasIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the same as, or is identified as, another specific entity or identifier.
-
C.
hasProofMethod
chosen
Indicates that there exists a specific method or technique used to establish or demonstrate the validity of something (such as a statement, claim, or theorem).
-
D.
hasNumberOfIdentities
Indicates the count of distinct identities associated with a given entity.
-
E.
supportsIdentity
Indicates that one entity upholds, validates, or reinforces the identity, self-concept, or role of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e555edc81909ca803587dafd747 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15d61a27881909faed490d2b65f39 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee625e3b408190a60c759fb0b28fe2 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:50 p.m.