Triple

T2245048
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federalist No. 78 E49482 entity
Predicate claimsJudiciaryHas P36444 FINISHED
Object judgment but not force or will LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judgment but not force or will | Statement: [Federalist No. 78, claimsJudiciaryHas, judgment but not force or will]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimsJudiciaryHas
Context triple: [Federalist No. 78, claimsJudiciaryHas, judgment but not force or will]
  • A. hasJudiciary
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
  • B. hasJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
  • C. hasTribunal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or subject to a specific tribunal, such as a court or adjudicative body, that has authority over its cases or matters.
  • D. hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
    Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
  • E. hasCourts
    Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is equipped with one or more courts (e.g., legal, sports, or judicial facilities).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa979788190ad6500f1d8eee2fc completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc0e8d5648190915ff689c7ca42bc completed March 7, 2026, 6:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbdb160248190aa75b38f11ad8602 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbe4252688190944491a450383450 completed March 7, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:47 p.m.