Triple

T22445545
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MiniScheme E554854 entity
Predicate inspired P9 FINISHED
Object TinyScheme NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TinyScheme | Statement: [MiniScheme, inspired, TinyScheme]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: TinyScheme
Context triple: [MiniScheme, inspired, TinyScheme]
  • A. TinyScheme chosen
    TinyScheme is a lightweight, embeddable implementation of the Scheme programming language designed for easy integration into applications.
  • B. MiniScheme
    MiniScheme is a minimalist implementation of the Scheme programming language that served as a conceptual and design inspiration for TinyScheme.
  • C. Chez Scheme
    Chez Scheme is a high-performance, optimizing implementation of the Scheme programming language widely used for both research and production systems.
  • D. PLT Scheme
    PLT Scheme is the original name of the programming language and environment that later evolved into Racket, known for its powerful support of functional and language-oriented programming.
  • E. MIT Scheme
    MIT Scheme is a long-standing, feature-rich implementation of the Scheme programming language developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, often used for teaching and research in computer science.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e5113208190ab58c6b595f9d1d0 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15b46e8ac8190bfa8c611ffcba822 completed April 29, 2026, 1:13 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.