Triple
T22444556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cross Project Council |
E554832
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | technical governance council |
C18231
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: technical governance council Context triple: [Cross Project Council, instanceOf, technical governance council]
-
A.
technical architecture committee
A technical architecture committee is a governing body of experts responsible for defining, reviewing, and guiding an organization’s technology architecture, standards, and strategic technical decisions.
-
B.
technology governance expert
A technology governance expert is a specialist who designs, evaluates, and oversees policies, frameworks, and decision-making processes to ensure that technology is developed, deployed, and managed in a responsible, compliant, and strategically aligned manner.
-
C.
technical management board
chosen
A technical management board is a governing body of senior experts responsible for overseeing, guiding, and making strategic decisions about an organization’s technical direction, standards, and priorities.
-
D.
technical committee system
A technical committee system is an organized framework that manages the formation, coordination, decision-making, and documentation of expert groups responsible for developing, reviewing, and maintaining technical standards, policies, or solutions within an organization or domain.
-
E.
technical subcommittee
A technical subcommittee is a specialized group within a larger organization tasked with analyzing, developing, and recommending solutions on specific technical issues or standards.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e5113208190ab58c6b595f9d1d0 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.