Triple
T2242415
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Immortal Seven |
E49425
|
entity |
| Predicate | actedAgainst |
P437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | absolutist tendencies of James II |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: absolutist tendencies of James II | Statement: [The Immortal Seven, actedAgainst, absolutist tendencies of James II]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: actedAgainst Context triple: [The Immortal Seven, actedAgainst, absolutist tendencies of James II]
-
A.
opposedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
accusedOf
Indicates that one entity has formally alleged or claimed that another entity committed a specific wrongdoing or offense.
-
C.
accusedIn
Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
-
D.
prosecuted
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
-
E.
defacedWith
Indicates that one entity has been damaged, marred, or vandalized using another entity as the means or material of defacement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa979788190ad6500f1d8eee2fc |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc0c017548190a71fb4a0e2a8189f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb160248190aa75b38f11ad8602 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:47 p.m.