Triple

T22423490
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Erdős–Rényi law of large numbers E554306 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object refinement of the law of large numbers C8028 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: refinement of the law of large numbers
Context triple: [Erdős–Rényi law of large numbers, instanceOf, refinement of the law of large numbers]
  • A. quantitative central limit theorem
    The quantitative central limit theorem provides explicit bounds on how quickly the distribution of normalized sums of random variables converges to the normal distribution, typically in terms of metrics like the Kolmogorov or Wasserstein distance.
  • B. central limit theorem
    The central limit theorem states that, under broad conditions, the sum (or average) of a large number of independent, identically distributed random variables tends to follow a normal distribution, regardless of the original variables’ distribution.
  • C. tool in large deviation theory
    A tool in large deviation theory is a mathematical method or result—such as rate functions, the Gartner–Ellis theorem, or contraction principles—used to quantify and analyze the exponentially small probabilities of rare events in stochastic systems.
  • D. result in probability theory chosen
    In probability theory, a result is a formally stated and proven fact—such as a theorem, lemma, or corollary—that describes a property or relationship involving probabilistic concepts like random variables, events, or distributions.
  • E. object in optimal stopping theory
    An object in optimal stopping theory is an abstract entity (such as a stochastic process, payoff function, or stopping rule) whose evolution or evaluation over time determines when it is best to stop observing and take an action to maximize expected reward or minimize expected cost.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4f2d0c819091aa3558ea2ee630 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.