Triple
T224134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japanese |
E4278
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Japonic language |
C661
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Japonic language Context triple: [Japanese, instanceOf, Japonic language]
-
A.
Austronesian language
An Austronesian language is any member of a large family of languages spoken from Madagascar across Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific to Easter Island, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features tracing back to a common ancestral tongue.
-
B.
Malayo-Polynesian language
A Malayo-Polynesian language is a member of a large branch of the Austronesian language family spoken across Southeast Asia, Madagascar, and the Pacific islands, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features.
-
C.
language family
chosen
A language family is a group of languages that have evolved from a common ancestral language and share systematic similarities in vocabulary, grammar, and sound patterns.
-
D.
Celtic language
A Celtic language is a member of the Indo-European language family historically spoken in Western Europe, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features found in branches such as Goidelic (e.g., Irish, Scottish Gaelic) and Brittonic (e.g., Welsh, Breton).
-
E.
Semitic language
A Semitic language is a member of a family of related languages originating in the Middle East and North Africa, characterized by root-based morphology and including languages such as Arabic, Hebrew, and Amharic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2573508588190b522c2476d91acfe |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.