Triple
T22361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California State Senate |
E443
|
entity |
| Predicate | apportionedBy |
P1682
|
FINISHED |
| Object | population |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: population | Statement: [California State Senate, apportionedBy, population]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: apportionedBy Context triple: [California State Senate, apportionedBy, population]
-
A.
appointedBy
Indicates that one entity has been formally selected or assigned to a position, role, or office by another entity.
-
B.
hasElectoralVotes
Indicates that a political entity (such as a state or district) possesses a specified number of votes in an electoral system used to choose an officeholder.
-
C.
enactedBy
Indicates that a law, policy, or formal measure is officially established or brought into effect by a specific authority or governing body.
-
D.
ratifiedOn
Indicates the date or point in time at which an agreement, treaty, or formal decision was officially approved and made valid.
-
E.
hasElectoralRepresentation
Indicates that one entity is represented in an electoral body or decision-making institution by another entity (such as a representative, party, or delegation).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a243b4ac2c8190b93c303df797b7b2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246e94ca881908f7a7d2c0b293033 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24654724481909ba14b7f68d2a472 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a246e7fac481909b0c500d4500650e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:34 a.m.