Triple

T22328963
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hodge filtration E551972 entity
Predicate relatedConcept P37 FINISHED
Object Griffiths transversality NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Griffiths transversality | Statement: [Hodge filtration, relatedConcept, Griffiths transversality]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Griffiths transversality
Context triple: [Hodge filtration, relatedConcept, Griffiths transversality]
  • A. Hodge filtration
    The Hodge filtration is a decreasing sequence of complex subspaces on the cohomology of a complex algebraic variety that encodes its Hodge decomposition and mixed Hodge structure.
  • B. Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations
    The Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations are fundamental positivity and orthogonality conditions on the intersection form in Hodge theory that underpin results such as the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge index theorem.
  • C. Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula
    The Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula is a result in arithmetic geometry that relates the Euler characteristic of an ℓ-adic sheaf on a curve over a finite field to local invariants such as conductors and ramification data.
  • D. Hodge theory
    Hodge theory is a branch of mathematics that studies the relationship between differential forms, cohomology, and complex geometry, particularly on complex manifolds.
  • E. Lefschetz hyperplane theorem
    The Lefschetz hyperplane theorem is a fundamental result in algebraic geometry and topology that relates the topology (especially homology and homotopy groups) of a smooth projective variety to that of its hyperplane sections.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Griffiths transversality
Target entity description: Griffiths transversality is a fundamental condition in Hodge theory stating that the Gauss–Manin connection shifts the Hodge filtration by at most one step, governing how Hodge structures vary in families.
  • A. Hodge filtration
    The Hodge filtration is a decreasing sequence of complex subspaces on the cohomology of a complex algebraic variety that encodes its Hodge decomposition and mixed Hodge structure.
  • B. Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations
    The Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations are fundamental positivity and orthogonality conditions on the intersection form in Hodge theory that underpin results such as the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge index theorem.
  • C. Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula
    The Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula is a result in arithmetic geometry that relates the Euler characteristic of an ℓ-adic sheaf on a curve over a finite field to local invariants such as conductors and ramification data.
  • D. Hodge theory
    Hodge theory is a branch of mathematics that studies the relationship between differential forms, cohomology, and complex geometry, particularly on complex manifolds.
  • E. Lefschetz hyperplane theorem
    The Lefschetz hyperplane theorem is a fundamental result in algebraic geometry and topology that relates the topology (especially homology and homotopy groups) of a smooth projective variety to that of its hyperplane sections.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e482f788190b78d1588fc26d606 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1576ab52c819087563cd778d6bc5e completed April 29, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:43 p.m.