Triple
T22309541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stark County |
E551475
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Holmes County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Holmes County | Statement: [Stark County, borderedBy, Holmes County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Holmes County Context triple: [Stark County, borderedBy, Holmes County]
-
A.
Holmes County
Holmes County is a rural county in the Florida Panhandle known for its small communities, agricultural landscape, and proximity to the Alabama state line.
-
B.
Holmes County
chosen
Holmes County is a rural county in Ohio known for its large Amish community and picturesque farmland.
-
C.
Holmes County
Holmes County is a rural county in central Mississippi known for its predominantly African American population, agricultural economy, and significant civil rights history.
-
D.
Louisa County
Louisa County is a largely rural county in central Virginia known for its small towns, agricultural landscape, and proximity to Lake Anna.
-
E.
Louisa County
Louisa County is a rural county in southeastern Iowa known for its agricultural landscape and small communities along the Iowa and Mississippi rivers.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e46c0188190800181a4233f28fe |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1574d53148190a1ec07f849e1ae9d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:42 p.m.