Triple

T22297458
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India E551156 entity
Predicate relatedLegislation P3136 FINISHED
Object Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 | Statement: [L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, relatedLegislation, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Context triple: [L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, relatedLegislation, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985]
  • A. Disputes Tribunals Act 1988
    The Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 is New Zealand legislation that establishes and governs the operation, powers, and procedures of the Disputes Tribunal for resolving small civil claims in an accessible, low-cost forum.
  • B. General Administrative Law Act
    The General Administrative Law Act is a key Dutch statute that sets out the fundamental rules and procedures governing how public authorities make and review administrative decisions.
  • C. Administrative Case Litigation Act
    The Administrative Case Litigation Act is a Japanese statute that governs how individuals and entities can challenge administrative actions and decisions through lawsuits in the country’s courts.
  • D. Ombudsmen Act 1975
    The Ombudsmen Act 1975 is a New Zealand statute that establishes and governs the powers, functions, and jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Ombudsman to investigate complaints about government agencies.
  • E. Rules of Decision Act
    The Rules of Decision Act is a federal statute directing U.S. federal courts to apply state law as the rule of decision in certain civil cases, forming a key foundation for the Erie doctrine.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Target entity description: The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is an Indian law that establishes specialized tribunals to adjudicate disputes and complaints relating to the recruitment and service conditions of public servants, providing an alternative to traditional civil courts.
  • A. Disputes Tribunals Act 1988
    The Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 is New Zealand legislation that establishes and governs the operation, powers, and procedures of the Disputes Tribunal for resolving small civil claims in an accessible, low-cost forum.
  • B. General Administrative Law Act
    The General Administrative Law Act is a key Dutch statute that sets out the fundamental rules and procedures governing how public authorities make and review administrative decisions.
  • C. Administrative Case Litigation Act
    The Administrative Case Litigation Act is a Japanese statute that governs how individuals and entities can challenge administrative actions and decisions through lawsuits in the country’s courts.
  • D. Ombudsmen Act 1975
    The Ombudsmen Act 1975 is a New Zealand statute that establishes and governs the powers, functions, and jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Ombudsman to investigate complaints about government agencies.
  • E. Rules of Decision Act
    The Rules of Decision Act is a federal statute directing U.S. federal courts to apply state law as the rule of decision in certain civil cases, forming a key foundation for the Erie doctrine.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e45fb848190a1b2ae21296e3a5f completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1572200c88190b9413286136fef15 completed April 29, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:41 p.m.