Triple

T22290342
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gmina Rytro E550976 entity
Predicate borderedBy P224 FINISHED
Object Gmina Łabowa NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Łabowa | Statement: [Gmina Rytro, borderedBy, Gmina Łabowa]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Łabowa
Context triple: [Gmina Rytro, borderedBy, Gmina Łabowa]
  • A. Gmina Łabowa chosen
    Gmina Łabowa is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship and known for its mountainous landscapes within the Beskid Sądecki range.
  • B. Gmina Łubowo
    Gmina Łubowo is a rural administrative district in west-central Poland, situated in the Greater Poland Voivodeship and known for its villages and agricultural character.
  • C. Gmina Łącko
    Gmina Łącko is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, known for its picturesque mountainous landscapes and traditional highland culture.
  • D. Gmina Łowicz
    Gmina Łowicz is a rural administrative district in central Poland, located in Łowicz County within the Łódź Voivodeship.
  • E. Gmina Łask
    Gmina Łask is an urban-rural administrative district in central Poland, centered on the town of Łask in the Łódź Voivodeship.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e45fb848190a1b2ae21296e3a5f completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1560adde88190961d8fc24c1c4b3c completed April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:41 p.m.