Triple
T22288492
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Major League Lacrosse |
E550925
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedRuleInnovation |
P1484
|
FINISHED |
| Object | two-point goal arc |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-point goal arc | Statement: [Major League Lacrosse, introducedRuleInnovation, two-point goal arc]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedRuleInnovation Context triple: [Major League Lacrosse, introducedRuleInnovation, two-point goal arc]
-
A.
innovationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is new, original, or creatively advanced compared to existing norms or solutions.
-
B.
innovationFrom
Indicates that something originates, arises, or is derived as an innovation from a particular source or prior entity.
-
C.
hasInnovationType
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of innovation.
-
D.
usedInnovation
Indicates that one entity applied or implemented an innovation (such as a new idea, method, or technology) in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
innovation
chosen
Indicates the introduction or development of something new or significantly improved compared to existing methods, products, or ideas.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e45fb848190a1b2ae21296e3a5f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15609854c81908adb7681cff2c404 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e72ffa438481908f80879aef2a589b |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:41 p.m.