Triple
T22275428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Roth |
E550590
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | obscenity case litigant |
C46044
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: obscenity case litigant Context triple: [Samuel Roth, instanceOf, obscenity case litigant]
-
A.
pseudonymous litigant
A pseudonymous litigant is a party to a legal proceeding who is permitted by the court to proceed under a fictitious or partially concealed name instead of their real identity, typically to protect privacy, safety, or other significant interests.
-
B.
free speech case
A free speech case is a legal dispute that centers on whether an individual’s or group’s expression is protected under constitutional or statutory guarantees of freedom of speech.
-
C.
legal scandal
A legal scandal is a widely publicized controversy arising from alleged or proven violations of law or ethical standards by individuals or organizations, often involving misconduct, corruption, or abuse of power.
-
D.
LGBT rights case
An LGBT rights case is a legal proceeding that addresses alleged discrimination, unequal treatment, or violations of civil or human rights based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
-
E.
group of litigants
A group of litigants is a collection of individuals or entities jointly involved as parties in a legal action, sharing related claims, defenses, or interests in the outcome of a case.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e43d8208190aff4f9cf7f2c2a8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:40 p.m.