Triple
T22250679
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jane Seymour |
E549967
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouse |
P13
|
FINISHED |
| Object | David Flynn |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David Flynn | Statement: [Jane Seymour, spouse, David Flynn]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: David Flynn Context triple: [Jane Seymour, spouse, David Flynn]
-
A.
David Flynn
chosen
David Flynn is the fourth husband of English actress Jane Seymour, known primarily for his marriage to the Golden Globe–winning star of "Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman."
-
B.
David Flynn
David Flynn is a film producer known for his work on the 2006 American Western thriller "Seraphim Falls."
-
C.
Daniel Flynn
Daniel Flynn is a British actor known for his work in television, film, and theatre, and as the brother of fellow actor Jerome Flynn.
-
D.
Jonathan Flynn
Jonathan Flynn is the troubled, self-destructive father and aspiring writer at the center of Nick Flynn’s memoir-based film "Being Flynn."
-
E.
Andy Flynn
Andy Flynn is a central fictional LAPD detective known for his gruff charm and evolving moral compass in the crime drama series "The Closer" and its spin-off "Major Crimes."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e41d9408190bd770cf282e22753 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f138bd45e88190919660d50c0b94bc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:39 p.m.