Triple
T22246601
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Linn County, Kansas |
E549859
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pleasanton, Kansas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pleasanton, Kansas | Statement: [Linn County, Kansas, largestCity, Pleasanton, Kansas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pleasanton, Kansas Context triple: [Linn County, Kansas, largestCity, Pleasanton, Kansas]
-
A.
Pleasanton, Kansas
chosen
Pleasanton, Kansas is a small rural city in Linn County known for its historic character and location within the southeastern region of the state.
-
B.
Plainville, Kansas
Plainville, Kansas is a small city in north-central Kansas that serves as the primary population and commercial center of Rooks County.
-
C.
Petrolia, Kansas
Petrolia, Kansas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Allen County in southeastern Kansas.
-
D.
Alta Vista, Kansas
Alta Vista, Kansas is a small rural city in eastern Kansas that functions as part of the broader Manhattan-area community.
-
E.
Palacky, Kansas
Palacky, Kansas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Ellsworth County in central Kansas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e41d9408190bd770cf282e22753 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f13218d1f88190b64b7f301328fa98 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:38 p.m.