Triple
T22238513
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hannah |
E549654
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterAttitudeTowardJane |
P146860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kind |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kind | Statement: [Hannah, laterAttitudeTowardJane, Kind]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterAttitudeTowardJane Context triple: [Hannah, laterAttitudeTowardJane, Kind]
-
A.
laterAttitudeTowardCathyLinton
Indicates the attitude or feelings an entity comes to hold toward Cathy Linton at a subsequent point in time, as opposed to an earlier or initial attitude.
-
B.
relationshipStatusWithJane
Indicates the current nature or state of an entity’s personal relationship with Jane.
-
C.
laterAttitudeTowardSilas
Indicates a change in stance or feelings that an entity develops toward Silas at a subsequent time compared to an earlier point.
-
D.
relationshipToJaneBennet
Indicates the specific familial, social, or emotional connection that one entity has to Jane Bennet.
-
E.
attitudeTowardÁntonia
Indicates the stance, feelings, or evaluative disposition that one entity holds toward Ántonia.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4102b881909cf47d3768e25c19 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f132123a048190ba5a90d7acb9aeb2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b5177d881908f90abde14ada7dc |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7222e74248190a2d3671049f117f2 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:38 p.m.