Triple

T2222909
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 9205 E48181 entity
Predicate updates P4061 FINISHED
Object RFC 7231 E40362 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 7231 | Statement: [RFC 9205, updates, RFC 7231]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: RFC 7231
Context triple: [RFC 9205, updates, RFC 7231]
  • A. RFC 7231 chosen
    RFC 7231 is an IETF specification that defined the semantics and content of the HTTP/1.1 protocol, including methods, status codes, and header fields, before being superseded by RFC 9112.
  • B. RFC 7232
    RFC 7232 is an HTTP/1.1 specification that defines conditional request mechanisms using validators like ETags and Last-Modified to support efficient caching and concurrency control on the web.
  • C. RFC 7230
    RFC 7230 is an IETF standard that specifies the core message syntax and routing semantics for the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1), including its use over secure transport like HTTPS.
  • D. RFC 7234
    RFC 7234 is an IETF specification that defines HTTP/1.1 caching semantics, including how responses may be stored, reused, and validated by caches.
  • E. RFC 7235
    RFC 7235 is an IETF specification that defined the HTTP/1.1 authentication framework, including the use of challenge-response mechanisms like Basic and Digest authentication.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa1ee708190862c8c378c41e9eb completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc03d1df88190950c691a4c246bd1 completed March 7, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae65605fa481908ac5b9d837600626 completed March 9, 2026, 6:14 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:47 p.m.