Triple

T22203206
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pennsylvania Dutch Country E548733 entity
Predicate hasCounty P285 FINISHED
Object Lebanon County NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lebanon County | Statement: [Pennsylvania Dutch Country, hasCounty, Lebanon County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lebanon County
Context triple: [Pennsylvania Dutch Country, hasCounty, Lebanon County]
  • A. Lebanon County chosen
    Lebanon County is a county in south-central Pennsylvania known for its mix of rural farmland, small towns, and historical communities such as the city of Lebanon.
  • B. Greene County
    Greene County is a rural county in western Illinois known for its agricultural landscape and small communities.
  • C. Greene County
    Greene County is a rural county in central Iowa known for its agricultural landscape and small communities.
  • D. Greene County
    Greene County is a rural county in eastern New York State known for encompassing a significant portion of the scenic Catskill Mountains.
  • E. Greene County
    Greene County is a rural county in western Alabama known for its historical significance in the Black Belt region and its predominantly African American population.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12b25eac4819094b3c50027ed66db completed April 28, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:36 p.m.