Triple
T22202749
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lunawada State |
E548720
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Santrampur State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Santrampur State | Statement: [Lunawada State, borderedBy, Santrampur State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Santrampur State Context triple: [Lunawada State, borderedBy, Santrampur State]
-
A.
Santrampur State
chosen
Santrampur State was a former princely state in British India, located in what is now the state of Gujarat.
-
B.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Alirajpur State
Alirajpur State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and ruled by local Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
-
D.
Jhabua State
Jhabua State was a former princely state in western India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and historically ruled by Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
-
E.
Ajaigarh State
Ajaigarh State was a former princely state in British India, located in what is now central India and ruled by a local dynasty under indirect colonial administration.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12b24c6fc81909e6ae62564846bd1 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:36 p.m.