Triple
T22200532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UEFA Cup 2004–05 |
E548668
|
entity |
| Predicate | defendingChampionQualified |
P146815
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [UEFA Cup 2004–05, defendingChampionQualified, no]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defendingChampionQualified Context triple: [UEFA Cup 2004–05, defendingChampionQualified, no]
-
A.
defendingChampion
Indicates that an entity currently holds a title or championship and is defending it against challengers.
-
B.
winnerQualifiedFor
Indicates that the entity identified as the winner has earned or met the conditions required to qualify for a subsequent stage, event, or status.
-
C.
defendingChampionDefeated
Indicates that the current competitor has defeated the reigning or previous champion in a contest or competition.
-
D.
isUndisputedChampionIn
Indicates that an entity holds a championship title in a given domain or competition without any current rivals or challenges to that status.
-
E.
defendingChampionRetainedTitle
Indicates that the current defending champion successfully kept their title in the subsequent competition or event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12aea51d48190a570cd36c106ab78 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7222e74248190a2d3671049f117f2 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:36 p.m.