Triple
T2219808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig |
E48113
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalSystemConcerned |
P605
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
courts of the Free City of Danzig
The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
|
E48113
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: courts of the Free City of Danzig | Statement: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig Context triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
-
A.
State Tribunal of Poland
The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
-
B.
Bavarian social courts
The Bavarian social courts are a specialized branch of the judiciary in Bavaria responsible for adjudicating disputes in areas such as social security, unemployment benefits, and other welfare-related matters.
-
C.
Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig
The Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig was a landmark decision by the Permanent Court of International Justice clarifying the legal status and judicial authority of the Free City of Danzig’s courts under international agreements in the interwar period.
-
D.
Supreme Court of Poland
The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
-
E.
Senate of the Free City of Danzig
The Senate of the Free City of Danzig was the executive governing body of the semi-autonomous Free City of Danzig under League of Nations oversight between World War I and World War II.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig Triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
Generated description
The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig Target entity description: The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
-
A.
State Tribunal of Poland
The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
-
B.
Bavarian social courts
The Bavarian social courts are a specialized branch of the judiciary in Bavaria responsible for adjudicating disputes in areas such as social security, unemployment benefits, and other welfare-related matters.
-
C.
Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig
chosen
The Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig was a landmark decision by the Permanent Court of International Justice clarifying the legal status and judicial authority of the Free City of Danzig’s courts under international agreements in the interwar period.
-
D.
Supreme Court of Poland
The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
-
E.
Senate of the Free City of Danzig
The Senate of the Free City of Danzig was the executive governing body of the semi-autonomous Free City of Danzig under League of Nations oversight between World War I and World War II.
- F. None of above.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSystemConcerned Context triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
-
A.
legalSystem
chosen
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
B.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
C.
legalSystemWorkedOn
Indicates that a legal system has been applied to, influenced, or modified by some agent or process.
-
D.
legalSystemFeature
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
-
E.
legalOrigin
Indicates the foundational legal system or jurisdiction from which an entity’s laws, regulations, or legal framework are derived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa1ee708190862c8c378c41e9eb |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc01386588190a9507f2969a201ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae655df21c8190aa9624f15955c565 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 6:14 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ae667dede88190b3d1f8bb8866e19e |
completed | March 9, 2026, 6:19 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ae66f12c648190a146de7b2bfdb541 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 6:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdac31d8819092d17815e11921e9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.