Triple

T2219808
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig E48113 entity
Predicate legalSystemConcerned P605 FINISHED
Object courts of the Free City of Danzig
The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
E48113 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: courts of the Free City of Danzig | Statement: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig
Context triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
  • A. State Tribunal of Poland
    The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
  • B. Bavarian social courts
    The Bavarian social courts are a specialized branch of the judiciary in Bavaria responsible for adjudicating disputes in areas such as social security, unemployment benefits, and other welfare-related matters.
  • C. Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig
    The Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig was a landmark decision by the Permanent Court of International Justice clarifying the legal status and judicial authority of the Free City of Danzig’s courts under international agreements in the interwar period.
  • D. Supreme Court of Poland
    The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
  • E. Senate of the Free City of Danzig
    The Senate of the Free City of Danzig was the executive governing body of the semi-autonomous Free City of Danzig under League of Nations oversight between World War I and World War II.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig
Triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
Generated description
The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: courts of the Free City of Danzig
Target entity description: The courts of the Free City of Danzig were the judicial institutions of the semi-autonomous city-state established under League of Nations protection between World War I and World War II, responsible for administering its distinct legal system.
  • A. State Tribunal of Poland
    The State Tribunal of Poland is a special judicial body responsible for adjudicating constitutional accountability cases against the highest state officials, including the President.
  • B. Bavarian social courts
    The Bavarian social courts are a specialized branch of the judiciary in Bavaria responsible for adjudicating disputes in areas such as social security, unemployment benefits, and other welfare-related matters.
  • C. Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig chosen
    The Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig was a landmark decision by the Permanent Court of International Justice clarifying the legal status and judicial authority of the Free City of Danzig’s courts under international agreements in the interwar period.
  • D. Supreme Court of Poland
    The Supreme Court of Poland is the highest judicial authority in the Polish court system, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and ensuring the uniform interpretation of law across the country.
  • E. Senate of the Free City of Danzig
    The Senate of the Free City of Danzig was the executive governing body of the semi-autonomous Free City of Danzig under League of Nations oversight between World War I and World War II.
  • F. None of above.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSystemConcerned
Context triple: [Advisory Opinion on the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, legalSystemConcerned, courts of the Free City of Danzig]
  • A. legalSystem chosen
    Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
  • B. relatedLegalSystem
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
  • C. legalSystemWorkedOn
    Indicates that a legal system has been applied to, influenced, or modified by some agent or process.
  • D. legalSystemFeature
    Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
  • E. legalOrigin
    Indicates the foundational legal system or jurisdiction from which an entity’s laws, regulations, or legal framework are derived.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa1ee708190862c8c378c41e9eb completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc01386588190a9507f2969a201ca completed March 7, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae655df21c8190aa9624f15955c565 completed March 9, 2026, 6:14 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69ae667dede88190b3d1f8bb8866e19e completed March 9, 2026, 6:19 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69ae66f12c648190a146de7b2bfdb541 completed March 9, 2026, 6:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbdac31d8819092d17815e11921e9 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.